The Short Term statistics model maintains three
intervals: current, previous, and cumulative totals.
Interval duration is defined by the Short Term Timer
(CfgFrPerfTimersSTInterval).
(1) Currently active short term interval
(2) Previously completed short term interval
(3) Cumulative total since last cleared.
Parsed from file MFRAP.MIB.txt
Company: None
Module: MFRAP-MIB
The Short Term statistics model maintains three
intervals: current, previous, and cumulative totals.
Interval duration is defined by the Short Term Timer
(CfgFrPerfTimersSTInterval).
(1) Currently active short term interval
(2) Previously completed short term interval
(3) Cumulative total since last cleared.
Parsed from file MFRAP-MIB.mib
Module: MFRAP-MIB
Vendor: Sync Research, Inc.
Module: MFRAP-MIB
[Automatically extracted from oidview.com]
mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationInterval OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { current-interval (1), previous-interval (2), cumulative-counts (3) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Short Term statistics model maintains three intervals: current, previous, and cumulative totals. Interval duration is defined by the Short Term Timer (CfgFrPerfTimersSTInterval). (1) Currently active short term interval (2) Previously completed short term interval (3) Cumulative total since last cleared." ::= { mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationEntry 1 }
mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationInterval OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { current-interval (1), previous-interval (2), cumulative-counts (3) } ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The Short Term statistics model maintains three intervals: current, previous, and cumulative totals. Interval duration is defined by the Short Term Timer (CfgFrPerfTimersSTInterval). (1) Currently active short term interval (2) Previously completed short term interval (3) Cumulative total since last cleared." ::= { mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationEntry 1 }
OID | Name | Sub children | Sub Nodes Total | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.2 | mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationDlciValue | 0 | 0 | The DLCI value with which the Statistics are associated. |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.21 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange1 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 1 (0% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.22 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange2 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 2 (1-10% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.23 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange3 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.24 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange4 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 4 (21-50% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.25 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange5 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 5 (51-80% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.26 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange6 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 6 (81-100% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.27 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange7 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 7 (101-150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.28 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange8 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 8 (> 150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.41 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange1 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 1 (0% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.42 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange2 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 2 (1-10% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.43 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange3 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.44 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange4 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 4 (21-50% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.45 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange5 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 5 (51-80% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.46 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange6 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 6 (81-100% o0f CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.47 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange7 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 7 (101-150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.48 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange8 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 8 (> 150% of CIR). |