The number of short-term intervals during
which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared
to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR).
Parsed from file MFRAP.MIB.txt
Company: None
Module: MFRAP-MIB
The number of short-term intervals during
which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared
to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR).
Parsed from file MFRAP-MIB.mib
Module: MFRAP-MIB
Vendor: Sync Research, Inc.
Module: MFRAP-MIB
[Automatically extracted from oidview.com]
mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange3 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR)." ::= { mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationEntry 23 }
mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange3 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER ACCESS read-only STATUS mandatory DESCRIPTION "The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR)." ::= { mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationEntry 23 }
OID | Name | Sub children | Sub Nodes Total | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.1 | mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationInterval | 0 | 0 | The Short Term statistics model maintains three intervals: current, previous, and cumulative totals. Interval duration is defined… |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.2 | mfrapPerfCirPercentUtilizationDlciValue | 0 | 0 | The DLCI value with which the Statistics are associated. |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.21 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange1 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 1 (0% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.22 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange2 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 2 (1-10% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.24 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange4 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 4 (21-50% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.25 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange5 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 5 (51-80% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.26 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange6 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 6 (81-100% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.27 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange7 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 7 (101-150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.28 | mfrapPerfCirRxPercentUtilizationRange8 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which rx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 8 (> 150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.41 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange1 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 1 (0% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.42 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange2 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 2 (1-10% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.43 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange3 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 3 (11-20% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.44 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange4 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 4 (21-50% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.45 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange5 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 5 (51-80% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.46 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange6 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 6 (81-100% o0f CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.47 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange7 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 7 (101-150% of CIR). |
1.3.6.1.4.1.485.8.5.6.1.1.48 | mfrapPerfCirTxPercentUtilizationRange8 | 0 | 0 | The number of short-term intervals during which tx data throughput on this DLCI compared to CIR was in range 8 (> 150% of CIR). |